Please see below for SCIG Success Criteria.
|
Originality and creativity of the project
|
|
Highly innovative; introduces a unique solution or concept new to the community.
|
|
Moderately innovative; combines new ideas with existing methods.
|
|
Some creativity, largely based on known strategies.
|
|
Minimal innovation; follows traditional approaches with little originality.
|
|
Clarity and Practicality of the Proposal
|
|
Clear, detailed plan with realistic steps; effectively addresses potential challenges.
|
|
Mostly clear proposal; minor gaps in planning or challenge management.
|
|
Some clarity; lacks detail for confident implementation.
|
|
Unclear or impractical plan for execution.
|
|
Expected Benefits to the Community
|
|
Likely to have significant, measurable impact on the target group.
|
|
Positive impact but limited or harder to measure.
|
|
Minor expected impact; affects a small group.
|
|
Unlikely to have a meaningful or measurable impact.
|
|
Long-Term Potential Beyond Initial Funding
|
|
Strong strategy for long-term continuation; identified resources and support.
|
|
Some potential for continuation; lacks a clear long-term plan.
|
|
Appropriateness and Justification of Costs
|
|
Clear, well-justified budget; aligned with project objectives; all costs necessary and reasonable.
|
|
Vague budget; questionable or excessive costs.
|
|
Project is significantly over budget
|